Technology

Every Major AI CEO Just Flew to Delhi. Here's Why That Matters More Than You Think

The India AI Impact Summit 2026 brings Pichai, Altman, and Amodei to the Global South. This isn't diplomacy theater. India is about to write the rules.
February 16, 2026 · 10 min read

Right now, as you read this, the most powerful people in artificial intelligence are sitting in New Delhi. Sundar Pichai. Sam Altman. Dario Amodei. Demis Hassabis. Bill Gates. Yann LeCun. Yoshua Bengio. Over 40 CEOs and 20 heads of state, gathered at Bharat Mandapam for the India AI Impact Summit 2026.

TL;DR: The India AI Impact Summit 2026 (February 16-20) is the first major global AI summit hosted in the Global South. Every major AI CEO is attending. This isn't just a conference. India produces 20% of the world's data, has 700 million internet users, and is positioning itself as the country that writes AI regulations for 1.4 billion people. Whatever gets decided here will shape AI deployment globally.

When every major tech CEO simultaneously clears their calendar for the same destination, something significant is happening. And what's happening in Delhi this week is a quiet power shift that will affect how AI gets built, deployed, and regulated for the next decade.

40+ Global CEOs attending
$100B Investment discussions on the table
1.4B People whose AI future gets decided

Why India, Why Now

The easy answer is market size. India has 700 million internet users. That number is still growing. The country produces close to 20% of the world's data. It has the second-largest AI workforce globally. For companies burning through billions in AI development costs, India is where the customers are.

But market size alone does not explain why every major AI lab cleared their schedule. China has comparable numbers, and these CEOs are not holding a joint summit in Beijing.

What makes India different is the combination of scale, accessibility, and regulatory leverage. India can plausibly become the country that sets the template for AI governance across the Global South. The decisions made in Delhi will influence policy in Southeast Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East. When 100+ countries are watching, getting India right matters far more than any single market would suggest.

The summit structure reflects this ambition. Three organizing principles called "Sutras" (People, Planet, Progress) branch into seven working groups covering AI safety, skills development, social inclusion, scientific research, sustainable computing, democratized access, and economic growth. Over 700 session proposals were submitted. The GPAI Council meets on the final day. This is infrastructure for ongoing governance, not a photo opportunity.

Key Insight: India is positioning itself not just as an AI market but as the country that writes the rules for how AI gets deployed in the developing world. If India's approach to AI regulation succeeds, it becomes the default template for billions of people. Every tech CEO understands this.

The Money Is Already Moving

Microsoft has committed $17.5 billion to build AI infrastructure in India over four years. That is not speculative interest. That is concrete capital deployed.

Anthropic hired former Microsoft India MD Irina Ghose to lead their local operations. OpenAI has established a dedicated India sales team. Google has partnered with the government and Physics Wallah to push AI in education. These moves predate the summit. The executives flying to Delhi are not exploring opportunities. They are protecting investments already made and negotiating the terms of expansion.

The hardware side is equally active. India's 21-year tax holiday for data centers has Nvidia monitoring the market closely. The semiconductor supply chain is shifting, and India wants a piece of it.

When I wrote about the $700 billion AI infrastructure buildout, I focused on the hyperscalers: Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Meta. But infrastructure requires location decisions. Power, cooling, land, talent, regulatory environment. India is making an aggressive play to capture a significant share of that buildout.

$17.5B Microsoft's committed AI infrastructure investment in India

What the Global South Frame Actually Means

This is the first major AI summit hosted in the Global South. That framing is intentional.

Previous AI governance conversations have been centered in the US, UK, and EU. Bletchley Park. Brussels. San Francisco. The implicit assumption: the wealthy nations that built the technology will decide how it gets governed. Everyone else adapts.

India is rejecting that frame. With 1.4 billion people, a massive and growing tech workforce, and increasing influence in global forums, India can make a credible claim to co-author the rules rather than follow them.

The attendee list validates this positioning. When Macron and Lula show up alongside the tech CEOs, when the UN Secretary-General participates, when 100+ countries send delegations, the message is clear: AI governance is now a global conversation, and Delhi is one of the rooms where it happens.

For companies building AI products, this matters operationally. If India sets strong data localization requirements, that shapes architecture decisions. If India's AI safety framework becomes influential across the Global South, products need to be built with those standards in mind from day one. Retrofitting compliance across half the world's population is expensive. Understanding where regulation is heading is now a core business need.

Practitioner's Take: If you are building AI products intended for global deployment, start paying attention to what emerges from Delhi. The regulatory frameworks being discussed this week will shape compliance requirements in markets covering billions of users. The time to understand these requirements is now, not after they become law.

The Geopolitics Behind the Tech

The summit happens against a specific geopolitical backdrop that does not get discussed enough in tech coverage.

The US-China AI competition has created an awkward gap. Companies cannot fully access the Chinese market. Chinese companies face export restrictions on advanced chips. The world's two largest AI powers are partially decoupled from each other.

India sits in that gap. It is not aligned with China. It has strong trade relationships with the US. But it is also not fully subordinate to US interests. India can work with American companies while maintaining relationships with Russia, the Middle East, and Africa that the US cannot.

For AI companies, India represents something rare: a massive market that is both accessible and strategically non-aligned. Building in India does not require choosing sides in the US-China competition. That flexibility has value.

The same dynamic applies to regulation. An AI governance framework that emerges from India will not be seen as American rule-making imposed on the rest of the world. It will have legitimacy in contexts where US or EU regulation might be resisted. This is why tech companies are engaging seriously with the Delhi summit rather than treating it as a secondary market exercise.

What Actually Gets Decided

The summit runs through February 20. The concrete outcomes will matter more than the speeches.

The government will release an AI Compendium documenting AI applications in healthcare, agriculture, education, energy, and gender empowerment. This is less exciting than it sounds, but it establishes the baseline for what India considers successful AI deployment. That baseline will influence policy.

The working groups covering AI safety and scientific research will produce recommendations. These will not have immediate regulatory force, but they will shape the conversation. When India's AI policy crystallizes (and it will), the summit's working group outputs will be reference points.

Prime Minister Modi's one-on-one meetings with 35-40 corporate leaders will be where the actual deals get made. Microsoft's $17.5 billion commitment did not happen at a plenary session. It happened in a room. The meetings happening this week will produce similar commitments, partnerships, and regulatory understandings. We will hear about them in the coming months.

Watch For: The specific language around data localization, AI safety requirements, and local infrastructure mandates. These details will determine whether India becomes a straightforward expansion market or a regulatory obstacle. The framework being established now will persist for years.

The Competition for AI Governance

A larger pattern is emerging. Different regions are racing to establish themselves as AI governance centers, each hoping their framework becomes the global default.

The EU has GDPR and the AI Act. The approach is precautionary, focused on rights and restrictions. It has influenced corporate behavior globally but faces criticism for potentially slowing innovation.

The US has fragmented federal regulation and strong industry self-governance. The approach is permissive, focused on letting companies move fast. It produces the most capable models but also the most visible harms.

China has state-directed AI development with tight content controls. The approach is nationalist, focused on using AI to strengthen the state. It is highly effective domestically but not exportable.

India is positioning a fourth path: AI governance that prioritizes inclusion and development without the EU's restrictions or China's authoritarianism. If India can demonstrate that this approach produces both economic growth and social benefits, it becomes attractive to the dozens of countries watching from the sidelines.

The summit is where India makes its case. And the fact that every major AI CEO showed up suggests the case is being taken seriously.

What I Am Watching

From my perspective as someone who runs AI agents daily, the most interesting signal from Delhi is the emphasis on practical deployment.

The AI Compendium, the case studies in healthcare and agriculture, the focus on skills development: these are not abstract governance concerns. They are about getting AI into actual use. India is not trying to slow AI down. It is trying to make AI work for a billion people.

This is different from the conversations happening in Washington or Brussels, where the focus often skews toward risk mitigation. India's frame is opportunity capture. How do we get the benefits of AI to farmers, students, and healthcare workers? How do we build the workforce to support AI deployment? How do we ensure that AI development happens in India, not just for India?

If this frame proves successful, if India can demonstrate large-scale beneficial AI deployment, it will influence how other developing nations approach the technology. That is a bigger deal than any single regulatory decision.

EU Approach

Rights-focused, precautionary. Strong on protection, criticized for slowing innovation. Exportable via market access requirements.

US Approach

Industry-led, permissive. Produces leading capabilities and visible harms. Exportable via company dominance.

India Approach

Development-focused, pragmatic. Aims for scale deployment and economic benefit. Potentially exportable to Global South.

The Week That Shapes the Decade

Summits come and go. Most produce communiques that nobody reads and commitments that nobody keeps. This one feels different.

The concentration of AI leadership is unprecedented. The investment discussions are concrete. The regulatory stakes are real. India has both the scale and the positioning to influence how AI develops globally, and the country is making a deliberate play for that influence.

For anyone building AI products, the message is clear: India is not a secondary market. It is a primary regulatory jurisdiction. What gets decided in Delhi this week will shape compliance requirements, market access conditions, and deployment strategies for years to come.

The CEOs understand this. That is why they are in New Delhi instead of anywhere else.

The rest of us should pay attention too.


The India AI Impact Summit 2026 runs from February 16-20 at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi. Updates will be posted on the official summit site as sessions conclude.

Advertisement

Share This Article

Share on X Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn
Future Humanism editorial team

Future Humanism

Exploring where AI meets human potential. Daily insights on automation, side projects, and building things that matter.

Follow on X

Keep Reading

Vibe Coding Is a Lie (And Also the Future)
AI Tools

Vibe Coding Is a Lie (And Also the Future)

The truth about Lovable, Bolt, and Replit after building 12 projects with them....

The $700 Billion Bet: What Happens If AI Doesn't Pay Off?
Thought Leadership

The $700 Billion Bet: What Happens If AI Doesn't P...

Big Tech is spending more on AI infrastructure than the GDP of most countries. H...

TIBBIR Is the Only Agent Running on All Four Layers of the New AI Commerce Stack
Technology

TIBBIR Is the Only Agent Running on All Four Layer...

Four infrastructure launches in 14 days built the complete stack for autonomous...

Your AI Agent Forgets Everything. Here Is How to Fix It.
AI Agents

Your AI Agent Forgets Everything. Here Is How to F...

Every AI agent loses its memory when a session ends. Decisions, preferences, pro...

Share This Site
Copy Link Share on Facebook Share on X
Subscribe for Daily AI Tips